
Building a Formula - Selection Criteria
and Dosing Strategies
© Chanchal Cabrera MSc, MNIMH, AHG
Introduction
Building a formula, determining the correct
herbs and the correct proportions, as well as
the dosing strategy, is the pinnacle of the art
of herbalism. It is the place and time when much
of the hard core science we struggle to learn
becomes useless and we are forced to rely on
experience, intuition and tradition. It can be
all too easy to get stuck using the same limited
repertoire of herbal agents because these are
what you are familiar and comfortable with.
Alternatively, there is always a risk that we
use new and novel herbs or herbal combinations,
not tested out over time and learned by
empirical observation, in an attempt to be
different or to keep up with trends. There are
many different factors to be considered when
choosing what herbs to include in a formula and
there are another set of considerations when
choosing the optimal dosage for the individual.
Know
The Patient
“It is more important to know what kind of
person has a disease than to know what kind of
disease a person has” Hippocrates
First you must be
clear in your own mind what kind of ailment you
are dealing with. Regardless of the fact that in
most countries you are not allowed to make a
diagnosis, it is still essential that you have
carried out a complete case history, physical
examinations where appropriate and in whatever
analytical modalities to which you have been
trained (western medical model, Chinese or
Ayurvedic tongue and pulse assessment, iridology
etc) and have come up with an adequate
assessment of the state of health of the
individual.
You can call this a
tissue state assessment, a clinical
health assessment, a health analysis
or any other name except 'diagnosis'. The
important thing is that you know what is the
physiological and physical root of the problem.
You should be able
to reach this state of knowledge drawing on the
many hours of studying you have done and by
comparing the client to the many 'normal' people
you have examined. This is the art of
differential diagnosis or differential
assessment and is where you determine that
this particular cough needs stimulating
expectorants whereas another may need soothing
anti-tussives. It is beyond the scope of this
book to teach these techniques, and each
practitioner will have their own modalities to
factor into the equation, but I stress that it
is one of the most important parts of our work
as herbal practitioners.
If you cannot
determine for sure what is the problem then you
have 2 options:
1) You can base your treatment on the
most probable cause of the problem while
continuing to monitor the client with the
possibility of altering your assessment and
treatment plan as needed.
2) You can refer the client on to
another practitioner for further tests and
examinations which you cannot do yourself.
If you choose
option 1 then you run a potential risk of
missing something dangerous and possibly doing
the client a disservice (in the worst case
scenario you could cause grave harm to the
patient by not recognizing a serious illness).
If you choose option 2 then you run the risk of
losing your client who may well decide to take
treatment from the person who finds out what is
the problem.
This seems like a
no - win situation but really it isn't. It is,
in fact, an opportunity for you to put into
practice many of the principles you have been
studying. The challenge of the Clinical
Herbalist is to learn how to choose option #1
and make it work .
In allopathic
medicine before the diagnosis is decided upon a
differential diagnosis is made.
Essentially this lists all the possible diseases
that could be affecting the patient and sorts
them into an order of most likely to least
likely. This process involves knowing the signs
and symptoms of many diseases and knowing the
significance of each of these. The doctor then
usually chooses that condition or disease that
fits the most accurately with the patients
particular signs and symptoms and treats
accordingly. But if the situation does not
improve within the expected time frame then the
doctor will re-assess and make a new diagnosis
as necessary.
Even though you are
not allowed to use the word 'diagnosis' there is
nothing to stop you from making a differential
analysis and using your list of probabilities to
choose the most likely cause of the illness.
An Example of
Differential Analysis in Action
A woman of 45 years
complains of heavy periods (menorrhagia) with
some irregularity and pain with bleeding
(dysmenorrhoea). She has been taking an
oestrogen supplement for 2 years as a treatment
for menopausal problems. During the case history
you determine that the irregularity takes the
form of inter-menstrual bleeding (metrorrhagia),
that the heavy flow has come on in the last 3
years and appears to be worsening, that there is
some pain on intercourse (dyspareunia) and that
she has no children (nulliparous).
Now make a list
(mentally or on paper) of all the possibilities:
|
Menorrhagia:
fibroids
endometriosis
uterine cancer
hypertension
hormonal imbalance
|
Dyspareunia:
fibroids
endometriosis
cervical dysplasia
anatomical abnormality
psychological disturbance
uterine or cervical cancer
ovarian cyst
|
|
Metrorrhagia
fibroids
mittelschmerz
endometriosis
cervical erosion
cervical cancer
cervical polyps |
Dysmenorrhoea:
fibroids
endometriosis
endometritis
hormonal disturbance
uterine or cervical neoplasm
anatomical abnormality |
Now you can work
out the probability of each symptom being caused
by the different suspected illnesses. The list
above was not made up in any particular order,
just as things came to mind but you can see
certain patterns emerging. Fibroids comes up
repeatedly as do endometriosis and neoplasms.
Apart from the
problems described earlier the client appears to
be in reasonably good health. There is no loss
of weight, in fact the woman is really a little
overweight. The appetite is good, there are no
sleeping problems and pain only at the times
already mentioned. Thus it is unlikely that she
has cancer because if it was advanced enough to
cause menstrual problems then there would also
be systemic effects, even though you must
remember that the oestrogen supplement is going
to significantly increase her chances of
developing uterine cancer. Endometriosis is a
real possibility especially as the woman is
nulliparous but she is actually rather on the
old side to be developing it now. Also the
menstrual irregularity of endometriosis more
usually takes the form of irregular cycles
rather than metrorrhagia.
Fibroids is the
most likely explanation in this case, given the
age of the woman and the fact that the growth of
fibroids is accelerated by high oestrogen
levels. It may be that she had some small
growths for many years that could have
interfered with her capacity to carry a child,
and only with the onset of oestrogen
supplementation did they grow large enough to
cause obvious distress.
You may be able to
confirm your suspicions by other modalities. For
example, if the woman is tending to be
overweight, especially with a preponderance of
fat in the abdominal area, then she may be
indicating a kapha or water imbalance in
that area which would predispose to stagnation
and congestion. On taking her pulses you may
notice a weakness in the liver, large intestine
or kidney meridians, all indicating a reduced
ability to eliminate toxins, so aggravating
congestion and sluggishness. If you use
iridology you will probably see markings in the
eyes indicating uterus or ovary problems.
Having reached a conclusion as to what you
believe to be the problem, you may then decide
to have further tests done e.g. in this case a
gynecologist could do an internal bimanual
examination and may be able to feel the growths,
or an ultra sound would show them up. However
you may feel secure enough in your assessment to
commence treatment. If so then don't forget your
differential analysis, you may need to refer to
it again if your treatment protocol is not
effective.
Pathological
Correction Versus Physiological Support
In holistic medicine the practitioner starts
with the premise that the normally functioning
body is free from disease, capable of resisting
disease and capable of healing from disease.
Based on this belief, the major focus of
holistic medicine is on supporting and enhancing
this inherent ability of the body to heal
itself. Physiological support, it is thought,
will bring about a deeper and more profound
healing than interfering directly in the healing
process itself. Holistic and natural health
practitioner believe in first supporting the
physiology to enhance optimal metabolic
functioning. Only when this is insufficient
will pathological correction be applied.
An example of this is seen in the treatment of
colds and flu. The allopathic physician will
recommend aspirin to bring down the fever, a
decongestant to dry up the mucus membranes and
an anti-tussive to reduce coughing. The holistic
practitioner, in contrast, will recommend a warm
bath and a diaphoretic (sweat promoting) tea to
bring up the fever and break the sweat which
will allow natural cooling. This temperature
spike will enhance white blood cell activity
against the invading microbe, and will reduce
the microbes virulence. Additionally, the
holistic practitioner will use inhaled essential
oils to deliver antibiotic properties directly
to the mucus membranes and open the passages, as
well as Plantain and Goldenrod to thin the mucus
and make it easier to clear. Mucus production is
an important form of primary defence in the body
and should be encouraged not suppressed.
Coughing is also part of the primary defence
system and, again, and will be promoted with
gentle soothing expectorants. If frequent cold
and flu are a pattern, the allopathic physician
will continue to prescribe antibiotics which
suppress the immune response, and flu
vaccinations. The holistic practitioner, on the
other hand, will address aspects of the diet and
life style as well as using herbs and nutrients
to boost immune response. Enhancing the natural
defence mechanisms of the body may obviate the
need for stronger, symptomatic medicines.
In clinical
practice one of the most useful techniques is to
elucidate the actual sequence of disease, what
Kerry Bone MNIMH has called the “causal chain”
of disease. He suggests that all disease
comprises 3 basic parts: pre-disposing causes,
excitatory causes and sustaining causes.
Pre-disposing causes that weaken resistance to
disease include such things as diet, stress
factors & stress management, environment and
attitudes, genetics & constitution. They can be
managed or minimized through nutritional and
lifestyle changes that can be taught and
learned. Herbs used to provide physiological
support include adaptogens, tonics, bitters,
circulatory stimulants and nervines. Excitatory
causes are responsible for triggering the onset
of disease symptoms. They include microbes and
pathogens, physical and emotional / psychic
trauma and toxins. They require a more
interventionist type of therapy or pathological
correction process. Herbs used to provide
pathological support include anti-vials,
anti-bacterials, anti-fungals, anti-protozoal,
anti-inflammatory, anti-tussive and
anti-spasmodic. Finally, sustaining causes are
those which impair resolution of disease such as
chronic, sub-clinical infections, inflammation
and so on. They require long term strategies
combining physiological support with
pathological correction.
For the person with
Fibromyalgia, for example, one part of the
causal chain might be explained thus:
A high stress
situation causes increased intake of caffeine
and stimulates the adrenal glands è this impairs
sleep
è the immune system
becomes compromised and release of Growth
Hormone is reduced è GH induced muscle repair is
impaired è micro-trauma to the muscle causes
pain, spasms and eventual formation of tender
points è pain causes impaired sleep è
commencement of a vicious cycle.
Knowing the causal
chain enables the formula to be more precisely
personalized. In this example physiological
support could be used strengthen the eliminative
and circulatory systems and pathological
correction could be used to dull awareness of
pain. Remember that it usually more effective to
give more quantity of a single herb than small
amounts of many different things. 5 or 6 herbs
in significant quantities (which vary with each
herb) is usually the most effective number - it
gives you room for all the herbal actions you
need and yet doesn't confuse the body with to
many chemical combinations all at once.
Traditional
Chinese Medicine bases the structure of the
formula on the principle of government. Thus
there is an Emperor that determines the overall
approach, various Ministers that support and
carry out the wishes of the Emperor, Assistants
who create the agenda for government and set the
political climate and tone, and Servants who
carry out the actual work. In the context of the
herbal formula this means that the herbs are
‘layered’ or each considered in juxtaposition to
the other parts of the formula as well as for
their own merit. The Chinese art of compounding,
or making herbal formulas, is impressive and
their energetic principles may be applied to
western herbs as well. Similarly, western herbal
medicine draws threads from Ayurveda and many
other indigenous herbal traditions.
The
traditional and time - honored
approach suggests that a formula
should have within it:
* 2
or 3 parts specifically active
against the particular
components of the condition.
*
1 part soothing and relaxing to
the affected area or to the
nerves in general.
*
1 part nourishing &
strengthening or tonic to the
affected area or to the body in
general.
* 1
part eliminative / alterative /
depurative.
|
The
Physiomedical model, as
described in contemporary terms
by Matthew Wood is:
*
keep the four channels of
elimination open (colon, kidney,
lungs skin)
*
cleanse the interior and support
anabolism
*
free impediments to the
circulation.
|
There is no right or wrong when making a
customized formula - there is only the question
of whether it is effective for the individual.
By careful analysis of the condition and careful
assessment of the herbs, and by regular
monitoring of progress, you will know if you are
on the right track.
DIFFERENTIAL
ASSESSMENT AND TREATMENT PROTOCOL
- LOGICAL
PROGRESSION
|
possible causes |
methods |
methods |
differentiate |
intention |
frequency |
expectation
|
|
genetic |
inspection |
blood
chemistry |
cure |
weekly |
|
one
year survival |
|
infection |
palpation |
urinalysis |
control |
fortnightly |
|
five
year survival |
|
functional / organic |
auscultation |
stool
exam |
palliative |
monthly |
|
ten
year survival |
|
psychological |
percussion |
X ray |
preventative |
quarterly |
|
permanent cure |
|
trauma |
|
ultrasound |
emergency |
yearly |
|
control
/ management |
|
drugs /
chemicals |
|
EKG |
follow
up |
|
|
prevention |
|
iatrogenic |
|
EEG |
|
|
|
|
|
unknown |
|
secretions |
|
|
|
|
|
others |
|
excretions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
others |
|
|
|
|
CHOOSING THE HERBS
Having determined the cause of the problem to
the best of your ability, you then need to
choose the herbal agents best suited to treating
the condition. Before thinking of the individual
herbs, though, there are several general
considerations to be factored into the equation.
Availability
There is no point in writing up a formula full
of exotic herbs which the patient won’t be able
to find readily. Even some herbs that are not
really exotic may be locally unavailable. For
example, when I practiced in Scotland one of my
favorite herbs in a tea for women’s health was
Lamium album (White dead nettle), a prolific
hedgerow plant in the UK. However, I cannot find
it from any supplier in north America so I do
not prescribe it in this form any more. There
are some herbalists who only use those plants
which row in their immediate vicinity but I feel
this limits us unnecessarily. Ginger may be a
tropical plant but it is easy to buy in any
supermarket so why not use it when appropriate?
Another aspect to this issue is what herbs you
happen to have in stock at any given time. Most
practitioners prefer to fill the prescription
themselves because that way you retain control
over the quality and are sure that the patient
leaves with exactly what you wanted them to
have. So you should check your own inventory
before writing a prescription, or tell the
patient where else they can purchase certain
products you don’t have. Be sure if they go
elsewhere to have a prescription filled that it
is not altered or adjusted in any way by a well
meaning store clerk.
Affordability
This ties in to some extent with availability -
if you prescribe hard to find herbs they will be
more expensive. The cost is a major concern for
many patients and keeping it within reach is
clearly essential if they are going to be able
to take enough of the herbs for a sufficient
duration of time to have the desired effect. You
may need to adjust your prescription to suit
their budget, for example prescribing teas as a
cheaper option than tinctures. Beware, though,
of assuming people can’t afford good health
care. Many people are quite happy to spend good
money on their health and they appreciate the
extra cost of high quality herbal products.
Another aspect to this issue is the cost to the
practitioner of maintaining a large and varied
dispensary. If you have a very busy practice
this might be possible, but you cannot tie up
all your capital in stock unless it turns over
fast so if you have only a small practice then
you will have to choose the key herbs you need
and forgo some of the lesser used ones. This
will limit you a bit but you won’t break the
bank.
Ecological
/ environmental concerns
One of the great dangers of the modern
renaissance of herbal medicine is the over
harvesting of certain plant populations. This is
exacerbated by the vagaries of fashion whereby a
certain herb will be promoted excessively and
often inappropriately. A good example of this is
Hydrastis canadensis (Goldenseal), an American
woodland plant, which is endangered in the wildand
is very hard to cultivate. It is so popular in
the mainstream today that it even appears in a
conditioner made in New Zealand! A responsible
herbalist will avoid the use of endangered
plants and seek appropriate substitutes wherever
possible.
Compliance
Herbal medicine
often tastes unpleasant and even very
intelligent people will often find themselves
making excuses for not taking that which they
have shelled out good money for. Children in
particular often don’t like the herbs. You may
choose to use a ‘corrigan’ or flavouring agent
such as glycerin, licorice or peppermint to make
the medicine more palatable. If you are trained
in aromatherapy you may also choose to use a
drop or two of certain essential oils such as
fennel, cinnamon or spearmint. If you are not
using bitters which must be tasted to be
effective, then you may suggest diluting the
tincture in apple juice rather than water or
adding a drop or two of a fruit juice
concentrate with the water. It is sometimes
worth considering the frequency of the dosing as
well. Inevitably it is preferred to take the
medicine at regular and frequent intervals (eg.
three times daily) because it keeps the blood
sugar more stable, but better to take it all at
once just one time daily than to give up and not
take it at all. It is also important to keep it
simple. As a herbalist you may really enjoy
brewing decoctions but does your patient have
time in the morning before dashing off to work?
Think about all the ways you can make it easier
for them without compromising the efficacy of
the treatment.
Synergy
Some herbs combine well together such as Rumex
crispus (Yellow dock) and Arctium lappa
(Burdock) while other may clash such as Panax
ginseng (Korean ginseng) with any strongly
astringent herbs. This may be based on and
energetic or constitutional understanding of the
herbs or may be based in the science of
pharmacokinetics (the uptake, metabolism and
excretion of medicaments). The pharmacokinetics
of herbs is very poorly researched and we are
forced at this time to rely mostly on empirical
knowledge and tradition for our understanding of
plant synergies.
THE ACTIONS BASED
APPROACH
Having considered the general parameters
described above, you are now ready to actually
choose the herbs for your formula. At this point
you need to be clear whether you are working
within a western model emphasizing physiology
and pharmacology or within an energetic model
emphasizing constitution and subtle energy
principles. It can get very confusing and
contradictory to attempt to mix and match too
many modalities or systematic approaches so for
the purposes of this discussion we will focus on
the western model but this is not to discount
the importance and validity of other modalities.
Normalisers and
Effectors
Some herbs may be chosen for their specific
biochemical impact on a certain aspect of
physiology, whether induced by single known
chemicals or through an action of the whole
plant. These herbs are considered the effectors
in the formula, included to achieve a certain
known result on a certain symptom or system
malfunction. They are applied in the context of
pathological correction. Examples could include
the bioflavonoids of Ginkgo biloba (Ginkgo)
which act as cerebral circulatory stimulants or
the tannins of Filipendula ulmaris (Meadowsweet)
which act as astringents to the upper digestive
tract.
Other herbs are
chosen for a more generic effect, regulating,
balancing and normalizing widespread
physiological actions. They are the used to
achieve physiological support and are sometimes
called tonics. They tend to be gentle and
require to be used long term. Examples include
Rubus ideaus (Red raspberry) acting in the
female reproductive organs and Crataegus
oxycanthoides (Hawthorn) acting in the cardiac
system.
A herbal formula
may include both of these categories of herbs.
Generally speaking, the more acute the problem
the greater is the need for effectors and the
weaker the constitution of the patient the more
normalisers they need.
Differential
assessment of herbs
This is purely action based, somewhat
reductionistic but still effective and sometimes
useful at least as a starting point in making
your therapeutic choices. Even while you are
taking the case history you may get 'flashes' on
what the client requires. Jot these down on a
separate sheet of paper as you go along. When
you have made your health assessment then begin
to write down a list of herbs that might be
appropriate based on the actions you wish to
use.
Differential
assessment of herbs for treating fibroids
In this case you would use astringents to
dry or shrivel up the growth, and you would
choose those with a tendency to act in the area
affected (ie. the pelvic cavity); you would use
pelvic decongestants to remove any
blockages and obstructions in the area; you
would use circulatory stimulants to bring
fresh leucocytes to the area and to flood the
area with oxygen which relieves spasms and you
would use uterine tonics to strengthen
and nourish the area and to improve the quality
of the membranes and tissues.
|
Astringents:
Capsella bursa-pastoris
Rubus idaeus
Alchemilla vulgaris
Geranium maculatum/robertianum
|
Circulatory stimulants:
Zingiber off.
Zanthoxylum americanum
Capsicum minimum
Achillea millefolium
|
|
Pelvic
decongestants:
Collinsonia canadensis
Lamium album
Achillea millefolium
|
Uterine tonics:
Cimicifuga racemosa
Caulophyllum thalictroides
Mitchella repens
Lamium album
Hydrastis canadensis |
For this particular
case you might choose:
Capsella bursa-pastoris
for it's powerful astringency.
Lamium album as both a
decongestant and a tonic.
Achillea millefolium
as a circulatory stimulant, a warming and drying
herb, a normaliser of all bleeding and as a
regulator of the female cycle.
Cimicifuga racemosa
and Mitchella repens as important uterine
tonics.
Alchemilla vulgaris
as a
mucous membrane tonic
Had you wished to prescribe Collinsonia instead of
Lamium or Zingiber as well as Achillea or any of a
hundred different permutations they could all have
been equally correct if the choice you make is
rooted in an honest conviction that this combination
is the very best one for the client at this moment.
The final choice may be made by intuition but you
cannot safely give your intuition free rein until
you first have mastered all the theory about health,
ill-health and herbs.
A
frequently asked question is "how long will the
treatment take?". The person who asks this must
first be made aware of the fact that you cannot ever
guarantee a cure, you can only express the
probability that herbs can help. In the years which
I have been practicing as a herbalist I have never
come across a person for whom the herbs could not
offer at least some relief, maybe not as much as
they would hope for, but better than nothing and
often much better than the other alternatives on
offer. It is impossible to give any general rule as
to how long a person may need to take herbs, it is a
totally individual thing. In general, though, the
longer a person has had a disease the longer it will
take to get rid of, and the more acute the condition
the more rapidly will the herbs work. Children and
small or frail people often react more quickly to
herbs than do larger people. A useful rule of thumb
is that, provided the client is following all
instructions correctly and has made any lifestyle
modifications required, then you would expect to see
some change within 2 to 3 weeks and significant
improvement within 2 to 3 months.
After your first consultation you would normally
have the client return within 2 or 3 weeks for a
second assessment, and thereafter at 4 or 6 week
intervals. For acute conditions you may wish to see
the client more frequently and for conditions which
are very chronic and are obviously going to take a
long time to treat then less frequent visits might
be alright. Again, treat each case as unique and
judge accordingly.
DOSING
STRATEGIES FOR CHILDREN
There are several different formulas that are useful
when considering the correct dose of herbal remedy
to give to a child. Perhaps the simplest is the
chart which can be easily adapted to suit either
tinctures or teas. Two other formulas are given
below:
Young's Formula
Age in years
= portion of adult dose
Age plus 12
Thus
a 6 year old child would be: 6
= 6 =
1 of adult
6 + 12 18 3 dose
Dillings
Formula
Age in years
= portion of adult dose
20
Thus
a 6 year old child would be: 6 =
3 of adult dose
20 10
ADJUSTING DOSES FOR THE
AGE OF THE PATIENT
When the adult dose is
one teacupful:
< one year old ................2 teaspoonsful
1 - 3 years..................... 3 teaspoonsful
3 - 6 years..................... 1 tablespoonful
6 - 9 years..................... 2 tablespoonsful
9 - 12 years................... 3 tablespoonsful
12 - 15 years................. 4 tablespoonsful
15 - 18 years................. 5 tablespoonsful
> 18 years .....................adult dose
When the adult dose is
one teaspoonful or 60 drops:
< 3 months................... 2 drops
3 - 6 months................. 3 drops
6 - 9 months................. 4 drops
9 - 12 months............... 5 drops
12 - 18 months .............7 drops
18 - 24 months .............8 drops
2 - 3 years.................. 10 drops
3 - 4 years...................12 drops
4 - 6 years...................15 drops
6 - 9 years...................24 drops
9 - 12 years.................30 drops
12 - 15 years ..............38 drops
15 - 18 years.............. 45 drops
> 18 years ...............adult dose
|